MINDEN PICTURES INC v. WILDLIFE INTGRATION LLC
| Minden Pictures, Inc. and MINDEN PICTURES INC |
| Wildlife Integration, LLC and WILDLIFE INTEGRATION LLC |
| 1:2022cv00258 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER CLOSING THE FILE. The parties have filed a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice. ECF No. #13 . See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the Clerk must close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/9/2022. (atm)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by MINDEN PICTURES INC. (DESOUZA, DANIEL) |
|
Filing 12
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/2/22. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 12/16/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/17/2023. Discovery due by 4/1/2023. Status Report due by 1/4/2023. (bkp)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by WILDLIFE INTEGRATION LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A to B) (MCKAY, CASEY) |
|
Filing 10
OMNIBUS ORDER ADMITTING CASEY SCOTT MCKAY PRO HAC VICE, STRIKING DEFENDANT'S ANSWER, AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER. The motion to admit Casey Scott McKay pro hac vice, ECF No. #9 , and (2) Plaintiff's motion to strike pro se Defendant Wildlife Integration, LLCs answer, ECF No. #8 , are GRANTED. Mr. McKay is admitted pro hac vice as counsel for Defendant Wildlife Integration, LLC. Defendant Wildlife Integration, LLCs answer, ECF No. #7 , is STRICKEN. Defendant Wildlife Integration, LLC shall file an answer through its duly licensed counsel on or before Wednesday, 12/7/2022. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 11/29/2022. (atm)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Casey Scott McKay.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7576138.) by WILDLIFE INTEGRATION LLC. (MCKAY, CASEY) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Strike Pro Se Answer by MINDEN PICTURES INC. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 12/7/2022). (DESOUZA, DANIEL) |
| Filing 7 **STRICKEN** per #10 order - ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by WILDLIFE INTEGRATION LLC. (alb) Modified on 11/29/2022 (atm). |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #7 Answer to Complaint. (alb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MINDEN PICTURES INC. WILDLIFE INTEGRATION LLC served on 10/28/2022, answer due 11/18/2022. (DESOUZA, DANIEL) |
| Filing 5 AO 121 Copyright New Case Notification. Copy mailed to the Register of Copyrights, U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (kdm) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WILDLIFE INTEGRATION LLC. (bkp) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bkp) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Summons to Be Issued by Minden Pictures, Inc. re #1 Complaint, (DESOUZA, DANIEL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wildlife Integration, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7509170.), filed by Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (DESOUZA, DANIEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
