COUNTS v. EXACTECH INC et al
Bobby Counts |
EXACTECH, INC., Exactech, US, Inc., EXACTECH INC and EXACTECH US INC |
1:2023cv00052 |
March 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
MARK E WALKER |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 23) re #4 MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-23). MDL No. 3044. (kdm) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 5 Interdistrict Transfer to the Eastern District New York Brooklyn Division. (New EDNY# 1:23cv02355.) (kdm) |
Filing 5 Interdistrict Transfer to the Eastern District New York Brooklyn Division located at United States District Court for the New York Eastern District 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, NY 11201. (kdm) |
Filing 4 MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-23) re #1 Complaint. MDL No. 3044. (Transfer to the Eastern District of New York.) (kdm) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to EXACTECH INC, EXACTECH US INC. (kdm) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (THORNBURGH, DANIEL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EXACTECH, INC., Exactech, US, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7745917.), filed by Bobby Counts. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Exactech, Inc., #2 Summons for Exactech, US, Inc.) (THORNBURGH, DANIEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.