JACKSON v. FLORIDA BELLS LLC
| NAKESHIA JACKSON |
| FLORIDA BELLS LLC |
| 1:2023cv00194 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESet Deadline per #10 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 10/18/2023. (kdm) |
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT of Discovery filed Jointly by FLORIDA BELLS LLC. (FEREG, MARK) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER Re: #12 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Discovery due by 3/1/2024., Dispositive Motions to be filed by 3/22/2024., Mediation Report due by 4/12/2024., Jury Trial set for 11/4/2024 08:30 AM in U.S. Courthouse Gainesville before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER.) Case referred to mediation. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/18/2023. (kdm)
|
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (FEREG, MARK) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by FLORIDA BELLS LLC. (FEREG, MARK) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 8/18/2023. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 9/1/2023., Status Report due by 9/18/2023 and every 30 days thereafter., Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/2/2023., Discovery due by 12/18/2023. (kdm)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK FEREG on behalf of FLORIDA BELLS LLC (FEREG, MARK) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by FLORIDA BELLS LLC. (FEREG, MARK) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NAKESHIA JACKSON. FLORIDA BELLS LLC served on 7/28/2023, answer due 8/18/2023. (STORCH, NOAH) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDRES KROBOTH on behalf of NAKESHIA JACKSON (KROBOTH, ANDRES) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions by NAKESHIA JACKSON (STORCH, NOAH) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by NAKESHIA JACKSON. (STORCH, NOAH) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (kdm) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to FLORIDA BELLS LLC. (kdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Florida Bells LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-8013165.), filed by Nakeshia Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons - RA, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (STORCH, NOAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JACKSON v. FLORIDA BELLS LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NAKESHIA JACKSON | |
| Represented By: | ANDRES KROBOTH |
| Represented By: | NOAH E STORCH |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FLORIDA BELLS LLC | |
| Represented By: | MARK FEREG |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
