HILL v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
KAREN CLAIRE HILL |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2023cv00267 |
November 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Service: AUSA PETER G. FISHER has been added to the docket for service and notice purposes only. (jcw) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KAREN CLAIRE HILL. (kdm) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (kdm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of a Final Decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration against COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by KAREN CLAIRE HILL. (kdm) |
JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK added. (kdm) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of a Final Decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (kdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.