TORTORIELLO et al v. GAGLIARDI
| MARGARET TORTORIELLO and JOSEPH TORTORIELLO |
| ROSEMARY GAGLIARDI |
| 1:2024cv00020 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #2 Notice to Pro Se. (***Per Chambers remailed to the address of MARGARET TORTORIELLO, JOSEPH TORTORIELLO 15301 CORTONA WAY, NAPLES, FL 34120.***) (kdm) |
| RESet Deadline per Chambers re #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- Objections due by 4/11/2024. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #6 , #7 Mail Returned. (kdm) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to JOSEPH TORTORIELLO Re: #2 Notice to Pro Se. (***Return to sender - Attempted - Not known - Unable to forward.***) (No forwarding address located.) (kdm) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to MARGARET TORTORIELLO Re: #2 Notice to Pro Se. (***Return to sender - Attempted - Not known - Unable to forward.***) (No forwarding address located.) (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. (kdm) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to MARGARET TORTORIELLO Re: #2 Notice to Pro Se. (***Return to sender -- Not deliverable as addressed - Unable to forward.***) (No forwarding address located.) (kdm) |
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to follow a Court order. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 3/27/2024.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 2/28/2024. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order - No response filed. (jcw) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiffs a civil rights complaint form for use by non-prisoners, a civil complaint form for use by non-prisoners, and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis for use by non-prisoners. This case number should be written on the forms. Plaintiffs have twenty-one days from the date of this Order to (a) file with the Court a fully completed complaint form; and (b) either pay the $405.00 filing fee or file a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Complaint due by 2/22/2024., IFP/ Fee due by 2/22/2024.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 2/1/2024. (jcw)(Forms sent as ordered.)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se. Mailed to: MARGARET TORTORIELLO, JOSEPH TORTORIELLO, 150301 CORTONA WAY, NAPLES, FL 34120. (kdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROSEMARY GAGLIARDI, filed by MARGARET TORTORIELLO, JOSEPH TORTORIELLO. (Attachments: #1 Sealed Attachments) (No service copies received, no fee paid, no motion for IFP received.) (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, (No service copies received, no fee paid, no motion for IFP received). (kdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
