KILPATRICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
3:2006cv00158 |
April 18, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Pensacola Office |
LACEY A COLLIER |
MILES DAVIS |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 175 ORDER - (1.) The Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Craig W. Roegner and the United States of America (Doc. 153 ) and by Defendants Amanda Griffett, Peter Faulk, James Andrews and the City of Pensacola (Doc. 151 ) a re GRANTED. (2.) The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff (Doc. 155 ) is DENIED. (3.) Consistent with this order, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter summary judgment in favor of Defendants Craig W. Roegner, the United States of Ameri ca, Amanda Griffett, Peter Faulk, James Andrews and the City of Pensacola. Plaintiff shall take nothing further by this action and goes without day. (4.) As all claims are resolved as against all parties in this case, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment and close this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 12/29/2009. (djb) |
Filing 157 ORDER AND NOTICE - The motions for summary judgment filed by the parties in this case (Docs. 151 , 153 , 155 ) will be taken under advisement by the Court on June 22, 2009. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 5/28/2009. (Advisement Deadline set for 6/22/2009.) (djb) |
Filing 145 ORDER Re: 141 MOTION to Dismiss Certain Parties and Claims filed by KAREN J KILPATRICK. (1.) The Complaint is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety as to Defendants BRAD BUDDIN, HARRY P. BARRACLOUGH JR., UNKNOWN ATF SPECIAL AG ENTS and CITY OF PENSACOLA EMPLOYEES, and these Defendants are therefore DISMISSED from this action. (2.) The claims and issues related to the violation of Plaintiff's First Amendment rights are hereby DISMISSED as against Defendants THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, AMANDA GRIFFETT, PETER FAULK and JAMES ANDREWS. (3.) The Clerk shall note that this Order does not therefore close this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 5/12/2009. (djb) |
Filing 117 ORDER - Defendant Craig W. Roegner's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED only with respect to Plaintiff's Count One claim of a violation of her rights to Due Process and is DENIED in all other respects. Defendant United States of America's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's state law claim of false imprisonment and is GRANTED in all other respects. Defendant Unknown ATF Special Agents' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice so that Plaintiff may have an opportunity for discovery. Plaintiff's 41 Motion To Strike is DENIED for reasons stated in Defendant Roegner's response and in light of the instant order. Plaintiff's 111 Motions for Case Management Conference and for Leave to File Reply (Doc. 114 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 9/26/2008. (djb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: KILPATRICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.