GATES v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
Case Number: 3:2006cv00555
Filed: December 13, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
Presiding Judge: MILES DAVIS
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re 1 Complaint, and 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by MICHELLE GATES -
1. Clerk to forward to pltf a civil rights complaint form (non-prisoner, 42 USC 1983), and a motion for leave to proceed informa paupe ris. This case number s/b written on the forms.
2. Pltf shall have thirty (30) days to file Amended Complaint, typed/clearly written on court forms and shall comply with instructions herein, including naming proper party plaintiff.
3. Pltf's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc.3) is DENIED without prejudice. She shall either pay the $350. filing fee or file new application to proceed "IFP" within thirty (30) days.
Signed by Judge MILES DAVIS on December 22, 2006.
  • Amended Complaint due by 1/21/2007.
  • Filing Fee due by 1/21/2007; Alternatively, IFP Motion due by 1/21/2007.
    (cbj)
  • Access additional case information on PACER

    Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

    Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

    Search for this case: GATES v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
    Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
    Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

    Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


    Why Is My Information Online?