ODOM v. SANTA ROSA COUNTY JAIL et al
| PHILIP LANDEL ODOM |
| SANTA ROSA COUNTY JAIL, PHS and WENDALL HALL |
| 3:2007cv00267 |
| June 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| ROGER VINSON |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING 40 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for either appointment of counsel or dismissal of this civil rights case, without prejudice (Doc. 39 ) is DENIED to the extent he seeks appointment of counsel and GRANTED to the extent he seeks voluntary dismissal of this action. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 12/8/2008. (djb)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: (1.) That Plaintiff's motion for either appointment of counsel or dismissal of this civil rights case, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, without prejudice (Doc. 39 ) be DENIED to the extent h e seeks appointment of counsel and GRANTED to the extent he seeks voluntary dismissal of this action. (2.) That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 11/5/2008. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/3/2008. (djb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
