MARTENS v. HALLEY et al
| STEPHEN M MARTENS |
| CHARLES HALLEY and JAMES R MCDONOUGH |
| 3:2007cv00323 |
| July 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Escambia |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER - DENYING 42 Notice of Appeal and 43 Motion for Certificate of Appealability as to STEPHEN M MARTENS. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on May 5, 2009. (kvg)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER - DENYING 32 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by STEPHEN M MARTENS. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on March 19, 2009. (kvg)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - re 28 Order, Report and Recommendation. The amended habeas petition 11 is DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on March 16, 2009.(cc: Martens) (cbj)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 1/29/09. ORDERED: The clerk of court is directed to change the docket to reflect that Walter McNeil is substituted for James R. McDonough as a Respondent. RECOMMENDED:That the amended habeas petition 11 be DENIED. That all pending motions be DENIED as moot. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/26/2009 (lcu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
