STEVENS v. ASTRUE
| LUCKY STEVENS |
| MICHAEL J ASTRUE |
| 3:2008cv00288 |
| July 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Escambia |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| ROGER VINSON |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING 31 Report and Recommendation. - Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Attorney Fees is Granted as follows: Plaintiff's counsel, Byron A. Lassiter, Esquire, is entitled to recover fees in the amount of $4,799.9 7 for representing Plaintiff before the USDC for the NDFL pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA); the amount of attorney fees and hourly rates requested under the EAJA are reasonable; and the Commissioner is directed to pay counsel that amount. - - - Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on February 16, 2010. (cbj)
|
|
Filing
31
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 29 MOTION for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) filed by LUCKY STEVENS - - It is recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs be Granted as outlined herein (see image). - - R&R flag set - - Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/10/2010.- - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on January 13, 2010. (cbj)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER - The Commissioner is ordered to REMAND this case to the ALJ for further proceedings consistent herewith, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 9/25/2009. (djb)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by LUCKY STEVENS: It is recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be Affirmed, that this action be Dismissed, and that the clerk be directed to close the file. - Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/10/2009. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on August 13, 2009. (cbj)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER re 12 Answer to Complaint filed by MICHAEL J ASTRUE - Pltf shall have SIXTY (60) DAYS to file memorandum* in support of his complaint. Deft shall within thirty (30) days of service of pltf's m emo file a response*. Clerk to return this file to undersigned no later than the due date of Deft's response. *Memorandums NOT TO EXCEED 25 PAGES. Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support due by 11/28/2008. Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition (tentatively) due by 12/28/2008. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on September 29, 2008. (cbj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STEVENS v. ASTRUE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LUCKY STEVENS | |
| Represented By: | BYRON ANTHONY LASSITER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
