STRONG v. BREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER
ERIC STRONG |
BREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC |
3:2008cv00402 |
September 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Pensacola Office |
Escambia |
MILES DAVIS |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER ADOPTING the magistrate judge's 63 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Brevard and close the file. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 5/26/2010. (djb) |
Filing 53 ORDER. The stay imposed by the court's August 25, 2009 order 44 is LIFTED. The final scheduling order is modified to the following extent. Discovery is closed as of today's date, October 15, 2009. All deadlines (includ ing the dispositive motion deadline) that are tied to the close of discovery are modified accordingly. The parties should refer to their joint report 24 for these deadlines. (Dispositive Motions to be filed by 11/16/2009 and Responsive memoranda shall be filed by 12/16/2009). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on 10/15/09. (lcu) |
Filing 50 ORDER granting 41 Second MOTION for Sanctions and for Dismissal for Plaintiff's Failure to Appear at Deposition of Plaintiff filed by BREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC. On or before September 25, 2009, defendant shall s ubmit documentation of the expenses it incurred in connection with the missed deposition, including attorney's fees and court reporter fees and appearance costs. Plaintiff may file his objection to the amount requested, if any, such that it is r eceived by the clerk of court on or before October 2, 2009. On or before October 12, 2009, plaintiff shall cooperate in scheduling and attending his deposition. (Miscellaneous Deadline - by 9/25/2009, Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 10/2/2009, and Miscellaneous Deadline - by 10/12/2009). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on 9/14/09. (lcu) |
Filing 49 ORDER denying without prejudice 45 Motion to Strike 45 MOTION to Strike as a Sham the Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Sanctions and for Dismissal (Plaintiff's "Respond to Dismissal Motion"). The motio n is not accompanied by a memorandum, N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(A), and fails to provide citation to authorities in support of the motion. The court will, however, consider the arguments and supporting affidavits presented in the motion when ruling on defendant's second motion for sanctions. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on 9/10/09. (lcu) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: STRONG v. BREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ERIC STRONG | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.