HAMEL-SCHWULTZ v. NEGROTTO
Plaintiff: MARY HAMEL-SCHWULTZ
Defendant: JEFFEREY P NEGROTTO, MARY MARTIN, DAWN M EFFER, U S TITLE AND REAL ESTATE CLOSING SERVICES INC, NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS OF MISSISSIPPI INC and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Case Number: 3:2008cv00529
Filed: November 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Real Property: Other Office
County: Santa Rosa
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ORDER ADOPTING 157 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant MERS' "Amended Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and (6) or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Supporting M emorandum" 138 and Defendants Universal Surety of America and The Continental Insurance Company's "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue" 145 are GRANTED to the ex tent Defendants seek transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The clerk shall forthwith TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The clerk shall close this case. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 2/11/10. (lcu)
January 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 157 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that MERS' Amended Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and (6) or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Supporting Memorandum 138 and Defendants Univ ersal Surety of America and The Continental Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue 145 be GRANTED to the extent Defendants seek transfer of this action to the Un ited States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. That the clerk TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. That the clerk close this case. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 1/8/10. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/5/2010. (lcu)
November 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER denying 130 Response filed by MARY HAMEL-SCHWULST. On consideration of plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order the court concludes the magistrate judge's order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to the law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's order is Affirmed. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 11/5/09. (lcu)
September 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER ADOPTING 96 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and this case is NOT stayed as to any Defendant. The stipulations for dismissal filed by Plaintiff and Defendants Martin and Notary Public Underwriters of Mississippi, Inc. 86 88 a re APPROVED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Martin and Notary Public Underwriters of Mississippi, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fee. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 9/10/09. (lcu)
August 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ORDERED: The Report and Recommendation and Amended Report and Recommendation previously issued by the undersigned 54 , 83 are hereby VACATED. RECOMMENDED: That Plaintiff's motion for stay 63 be DENIED and this case NOT be stayed as to any Defendant. That the stipulations for dismissal filed by Plaintiff and Defendants Martin and Notary Public Underwriters of Mississippi, Inc. 86 , 88 be APPROVED and Plaintiff's claims agai nst Defendants Martin and Notary Public Underwriters of Mississippi, Inc. be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fee. R&R flag set. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/2/2009). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 8/5/09. (lcu)
July 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ****VACATED**** Amended REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Amending 54 Report and Recommendation). That unless and until otherwise ordered, all proceedings in this case against Defendant Jefferey Negrotto be STAYED pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. That Plaintiff's motion for stay 63 be DENIED and this action NOT be stayed as against the other Defendants. That Defendant Jefferey Negrotto file a notice within THIRTY (30) DAYS after the occurrence of any event or condition t erminating the automatic stay either explicitly or by operation of law. That each other party file a notice within THIRTY (30) DAYS after the party or its attorney learns of the occurrence of any event or condition terminating the automatic stay eit her explicitly or by operation of law, provided, however, that if one such notice has been filed by any party, no party need file any additional notice. ( Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/21/2009). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 7/24/09. (lcu) ****VACATED****pursuant to 96 Order, Report and Recommendation. Modified on 8/5/2009 (lcu).
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ****VACATED**** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 5/27/09. RECOMMENDED: (1) That unless and until otherwise ordered, all proceedings in this case against Defendant Jefferey Negrotto be STA YED pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. (2) That this action NOT be stayed as against the other Defendants. (3) That Defendant Jefferey Negrotto file a notice within THIRTY (30) DAYS after the occurrence of any event or condition terminating the auto matic stay either explicitly or by operation of law. (4) That each other party file a notice within THIRTY (30) DAYS after the party or its attorney learns of the occurrence of any event or condition terminating the automatic stay either explicitly or by operation of law, provided, however, that if one such notice has been filed by any party, no party need file any additional notice. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/24/2009 (lcu) ****VACATED**** pursuant to 96 Order, Report and Recommendation. Modified on 8/5/2009 (lcu).
April 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting 34 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss Per Fed. R. of Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and (b)(6); alternative motion to transfer per 28 U.S.C. s 1406; and alternative motion to stay pendi ng arbitration. All parties except Defendant Negrotto shall confer and file, within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, a report of their positions regarding whether proceedings in this court should also be stayed as against the Defendants not in bankruptcy. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 4/21/09.Miscellaneous Deadline - by 5/12/2009 (lcu)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAMEL-SCHWULTZ v. NEGROTTO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARY HAMEL-SCHWULTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEFFEREY P NEGROTTO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARY MARTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAWN M EFFER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U S TITLE AND REAL ESTATE CLOSING SERVICES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS OF MISSISSIPPI INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?