Bryant et al v. LAKEVIEW CENTER INC
| Archie Bryant, Danielle Acoff, Kathy Rivers, Romona Broughton and Cyndy Walker |
| LAKEVIEW CENTER INC |
| 3:2009cv00263 |
| June 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Escambia |
| ROGER VINSON |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Plaintiff |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
217
ORDER. The Clerk is instructed to remove this case from the active docket of the court, and the parties shall have 60 days in which to file a motion to approve their settlement agreement in accordance with this order. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on June 24, 2011. (kvg)
|
|
Filing
95
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER - (See order image) - This Consent Protective Order shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of the Litigation, except that the parties may by subsequent agreement or stipulation modify or dissolve this Consent Protective Order at any time during or after completion of the Litigation. The Court retains jurisdiction over the parties for enforcement of this Consent Protective Order during and after conclusion of the Litigation. - - Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on May 26, 2010. (cbj)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER. This cause of action will proceed pursuant to the two-stage procedure for managing FLSA collective actions set forth by the Eleventh Circuit. First, the defendant will be required to respond to the plaintiff's motion f or conditional certification and notice, following which the court will make a threshold "similarly situated" determination. If the plaintiffs meet this showing, the court will permit a 90-day discovery period on the limited "similarly situated" issue. Second, if the defendant moves for decertification, the court will make a more informed factual determination of similarity at that time. Discovery on the merits will proceed thereafter. For reasons stated at the hearing, Defe ndant's Motion 82 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: (a) Defendant Lakeview Center, Inc. is instructed to file its response to Plaintiffs' Motion 70 , specifically including any objections to the text of plaintiffs' p roposed notice, on or before May 27, 2010, (b) Defendant is not permitted to engage in discovery prior to filing its response. The court will enter a separate order dealing with the defendant's proposed protection order and stipulation on electronic discovery. The deadlines set forth in the Initial Scheduling Order are stayed until further order of the court. (Response to motion due by by 5/27/2010). Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 4/27/10. (lcu)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER re 30 Emergency MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Disposition in Talbott et al. v. Lakeview Center, Inc. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 10th day of August, 2009, that a temporary 14-day stay is GRA NTED. A final ruling on the emergency motion for a stay of the proceedings will be entered before the end of that period. (Deadline for clerk to check status of stay by 8/24/2009). Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 8/10/09. (lcu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
