LEVITAN v. MARY ANN PATTI LLC
| DANIEL J LEVITAN |
| MARY ANN PATTI LLC |
| 3:2009cv00321 |
| July 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Escambia |
| MILES DAVIS |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| None |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - (1) Adopting 169 Report and Recommendation. (2) Denying as moot 97 Motion to Dismiss. (3) Denying as moot 99 Motion to Dismiss. (4) Granting 144 Motion to Amend/Correct. (5) Dismissing s ua sponte 146 Fourth Amended Complaint. Said dismissals are with prejudice as to COunts I, II, V, VI, VII and without prejudice as to Counts III, IV, VIII, and IX. (7) Denying as moot 147 Motion for Joinder. (8) The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/31/2011. (sps)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING the magistrate judge's 71 Report and Recommendation. (2.) The 12 MOTION to Dismiss of defendant SCENIC VIEW PROPERTIES LLC, is GRANTED. (3.) The 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by defendant RAM 2000 CONTRACTO RS INC, is GRANTED. (4.) The 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by defendants KEITH GUTHRIE, MARY ANN PATTI LLC, MARY ANN PATTI GUTHRIE, is GRANTED. (5.) Said dismissals are without prejudice to the plaintiffs filing, within 28 days of this order, a seco nd amended complaint that corrects the legal deficiencies identified in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation of February 22, 2010. Failure to file a second amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case. (6.) In light of the foregoing, plaintiffs' 51 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/18/2010. (Second Amended Complaint due by 4/15/2010.) (djb)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1) The Plas' 25 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunctive Relief is Denied. 3) The Dfts' requests for costs, other sanctions and damages are Denied. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 1/15/2010. (laj)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - a) That plas' 25 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunctive Relief be denied. 2) That dfts' requests for costs, other sanctions and damages be denied. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on 9/16/2009. **Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/14/2009. (laj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LEVITAN v. MARY ANN PATTI LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DANIEL J LEVITAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARY ANN PATTI LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
