ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL
Plaintiff: ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and AVENGE INCORPORATED
Case Number: 3:2009cv00395
Filed: September 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Okaloosa
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Presiding Judge: ROGER VINSON
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 190 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION. A preponderance of the evidence does not support the pla's claims, and because the pla carries the burden of proof, judgment must be entered in favor of the dfts. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of dfts and against pla, together with taxable costs. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on July 9, 2013. (kvg)
September 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER - - 1. On or before September 20, 2010, Avenge shall provide supplemental responses to Requests 60-103 to the Request for Admission propounded by Arch. - 2. Arch's 85 Amended Motion to Compel directed to Avenge is DENIED, as moot and without prejudice. 3. Arch's 84 Motion to Compel directed to the United States is DENIED, as moot and without prejudice.- - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on September 17, 2010. (cbj)
September 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER - GRANTED, the parties' 92 Joint MOTION for Revision of the Case Scheduling Order. - - The 21 Final Scheduling Order, which incorporated the parties' 20 Joint Report, is amended as outlined (see order image). - - Close of Non-Expert Fact Discovery 3/31/2011; All Discovery to be completed by 10/14/2011. - (Dispositive Motions to be filed by 12/16/2011. Mediation to take place by 1/20/2012. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on September 13, 2010. (cbj)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY DISPUTES (see order image) re 85 Amended MOTION to Compel, 88 Order. - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on August 23, 2010. (cbj)
March 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER - The United State's 26 Motion to Dismiss is Granted, and Avenge's crossclaim 14 * is Dismissed for failure to exhaust.--- Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on March 26, 2010. (cbj) - *Modified on 3/29/2010 (cbj).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER DAVID BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AVENGE INCORPORATED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?