NAVOY v. BABCOCK

NAVOY v. BABCOCK

Petitioner:	CHRISTIAN JAMES NAVOY
Respondent:	MICHAEL BABCOCK
Case Number:	3:2010cv00035
Filed:	February 4, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office:	Pensacola Office
County:	Escambia
Presiding Judge:	MILES DAVIS
Presiding Judge:	M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 26, 2010	Filing 9 ORDER re 6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by CHRISTIAN JAMES NAVOY. - - The clerk of court is directed to furnish copies of the amended petition, including attachments, and this order to the Respondents and the United States Attorney for this district. Respondents shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this order in which to show cause, if any there be, why the relief requested should not be granted. - - - (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 4/27/2010 . ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on February 26, 2010. - - (cc: USAtty PN; BABCOCK R/R# 7008 2810 0002 1522 9641; LAPPIN R/R# 7008 2810 0002 1522 9634) (cbj)
February 17, 2010	Filing 7 ORDER re 6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by CHRISTIAN JAMES NAVOY - - Within twenty-one (21) days from order date, petitioner shall submit one complete copy of his amended § 2241 petition and attachments, and two copies of the six page amended § 2241 petition form. - - ( Service Copies due by 3/10/2010. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on February 17, 2010. (cbj)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 26, 2010

Filing 9 ORDER re 6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by CHRISTIAN JAMES NAVOY. - - The clerk of court is directed to furnish copies of the amended petition, including attachments, and this order to the Respondents and the United States Attorney for this district. Respondents shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this order in which to show cause, if any there be, why the relief requested should not be granted. - - - (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 4/27/2010 . ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on February 26, 2010. - - (cc: USAtty PN; BABCOCK R/R# 7008 2810 0002 1522 9641; LAPPIN R/R# 7008 2810 0002 1522 9634) (cbj)

February 17, 2010

Filing 7 ORDER re 6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by CHRISTIAN JAMES NAVOY - - Within twenty-one (21) days from order date, petitioner shall submit one complete copy of his amended § 2241 petition and attachments, and two copies of the six page amended § 2241 petition form. - - ( Service Copies due by 3/10/2010. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on February 17, 2010. (cbj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NAVOY v. BABCOCK
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: CHRISTIAN JAMES NAVOY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL BABCOCK
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?