PEARSON v. WILLIAMS

PEARSON v. WILLIAMS

Plaintiff:	SAM J PEARSON, IV
Defendant:	JOYCE H WILLIAMS
Case Number:	3:2010cv00348
Filed:	September 9, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office:	Pensacola Office
County:	Escambia
Presiding Judge:	M CASEY RODGERS
Presiding Judge:	ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2011	Filing 22 ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief and for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/28/2011. (djb)
September 16, 2010	Filing 5 ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by SAM J PEARSON, IV - - 1. Pla's 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is Denied, without prejudice. - 2. Clerk to send Pla a copy of form for non-prisoner pro se parties to request IF P and a civil rights complaint form for non-prisoners (42:1983). This case number should be written on both forms. - 3. Within thirty (30) days from docketing date of this order, pla shall file Amended Complaint. Within same period, pla shall file co mpleted amended IFP motion or, alternatively, submit $350.00 filing fee. - - (Amended Pleadings due by 10/18/2010. Filing Fee due by 10/18/2010 ; Alternatively, IFP Motion due by 10/18/2010. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on September 16, 2010.- - (forms to pla) (cbj)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2011

Filing 22 ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief and for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/28/2011. (djb)

September 16, 2010

Filing 5 ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by SAM J PEARSON, IV - - 1. Pla's 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is Denied, without prejudice. - 2. Clerk to send Pla a copy of form for non-prisoner pro se parties to request IF P and a civil rights complaint form for non-prisoners (42:1983). This case number should be written on both forms. - 3. Within thirty (30) days from docketing date of this order, pla shall file Amended Complaint. Within same period, pla shall file co mpleted amended IFP motion or, alternatively, submit $350.00 filing fee. - - (Amended Pleadings due by 10/18/2010. Filing Fee due by 10/18/2010 ; Alternatively, IFP Motion due by 10/18/2010. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on September 16, 2010.- - (forms to pla) (cbj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PEARSON v. WILLIAMS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: SAM J PEARSON, IV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JOYCE H WILLIAMS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?