Meyer v. The St. Joe Company et al
Robert J. Meyer |
The St. Joe Company, William Britton Greene, William S. McCalmont, Peter S. Rummell, Janna L. Connolly, Michael L. Ainslie, Hugh M. Durden, Thomas A. Fanning, Harry H. Frampton, III, Adam W. Herbert, Jr., Delores M. Kesler, John S. Lord, Walter L. Revell, William H. Walton, III, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and KPMG LLP |
3:2010cv00452 |
November 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Pensacola Office |
Walton |
RICHARD SMOAK |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER Pursuant to Fla. N.D. Loc. 3.1(C), the venue for this case is transferred from the Pensacola Division to the Panama City Division.The Clerk shall change the case number for Weissman v. The St. Joe Co., et al. from 3:10cv504 t o 5:11cv28. The Clerk shall change the case number for Meyer v. The St. Joe Co., et al. from 3:10cv452 to 5:11cv27. All future pleadings & communications for the consolidated cases shall refer to Panama City Division & Case No. 5:11cv27/RS/EMT. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/28/2011. (sea) |
Filing 40 ORDER City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System is designated lead pla. Their Motion for Appointment 21 is GRANTED. The law firms Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, & Labaton Sucharow LLP are approved as lead counsel. Ci ty of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System's Motion for Approval 21 is GRANTED. Gerald L. Hess & Richard L. Kneisel's Motion for Appointment as Lead Plas, & Approval of Their Selection of Co-Lead & Co-Liaison Counsel 20 are DENIED. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/25/2011. (sea) |
Filing 30 ORDER The Joint Motion Requesting Relief from the Initial Scheduling Order 29 is DENIED to the extent that is seeks relief from the "Attorneys' Fee Records" requirement. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/18/2011. (sea) |
Filing 28 ORDER The clerk shall ensure that counsel for Gerald L. Hess & Richard L. Kneisel, City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System, & Steven L. Weissmann are listed on CM/ECF as plas to ensure adequate electronic notice of all p leadings. The prospective lead plas shall file a memorandum, not later than 1/24/2011, why City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System is not entitled to be designated as lead pla. GERALD L HESS, RICHARD L KNEISEL, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD FIRE & POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and STEVEN L WEISSMANN added. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/11/2011. (sea) |
Filing 8 ORDER granted 7 Consent MOTION to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Defendants shall file responsive pleadings to the Complaint not later than 12/27/2010. MICHAEL L AINSLIE answer due 12/27/2010; JAN NA L CONNOLLY answer due 12/27/2010; DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC answer due 12/27/2010; HUGH M DURDEN answer due 12/27/2010; THOMAS A FANNING answer due 12/27/2010; HARRY H FRAMPTON, III answer due 12/27/2010; WILLIAM BRITTON GREENE answer due 12/27 /2010; ADAM W HERBERT, JR answer due 12/27/2010; DELORES M KESLER answer due 12/27/2010; KPMG LLP answer due 12/27/2010; JOHN S LORD answer due 12/27/2010; WILLIAM S MCCALMONT answer due 12/27/2010; WALTER L REVELL answer due 12/27/2010; PETER S RUMMELL answer due 12/27/2010; THE ST JOE COMPANY answer due 12/27/2010; WILLIAM H WALTON, III answer due 12/27/2010. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 12/7/2010. (sea) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.