JACOBS v. GIELOW et al
| JARVEY JACOBS, JR |
| WALTER GIELOW, JEFFERSON DAVIS and KYLE HALL |
| 3:2011cv00520 |
| October 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
229
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants JEFFERSON DAVIS and KYLE HALL and against Plaintiff JARVEY JACOBS, JR. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR on 2/26/2015. 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 5/27/2015 (sps)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 165 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' 123 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim against Defendant Gielow, and Defendant Gielow is therefore DIS MISSED from this action; is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Hall regarding his removal of plaintiff's clothing; is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for compensatory and punitive damages; is DENIED as to Plaintiff's excessive force claims against Defendants Hall and Davis. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/7/2014. (djb)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (doc. 8 ) is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on January 17, 2012. (pmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
