LISTER v. EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
WAYNE A LISTER
Defendant:
EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Case Number:
3:2012cv00322
Filed:
June 26, 2012
Court:
Florida Northern District Court
Office:
Pensacola Office
County:
Alachua
Presiding Judge:
M CASEY RODGERS
Referring Judge:
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit:
Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:
42:1983
Jury Demanded By:
None
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LISTER v. EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY | |
| Represented By: | ELIZABETH BROWN BURGESS |
| Represented By: | PAUL DAVID BRANNON |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WAYNE A LISTER | |
| Represented By: | CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS |
| Represented By: | RICHARD JOHN WESTBERRY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
