WATSON v. EDELEN et al
| TYSON N WATSON |
| JOHN DOE, W D RUMMEL, R P JOHNSON, EDELEN, D J ROGERS and B HAWKINS |
| 3:2012cv00365 |
| July 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
ORDER ADOPTING 166 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants (doc. 124 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 124) is DENIED as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Edelen and Johnson regarding the use of force on March 1, 2012. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 124) is DENIED as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of exc essive force against Defendants Edelen and Rogers regarding the use of force on March 4, 2012. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims for compensatory and punitive damages related to the uses of force of March 1 and 4, 2012. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's remaining claims. Defendant Hawkins is DISMISSED from this action. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/5/2015. (sdw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
