WARREN v. CREWS

Respondent: MICHAEL CREWS
Petitioner: DONNIE WARREN
Case Number: 3:2013cv00296
Filed: April 26, 2013
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Santa Rosa
Referring Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Presiding Judge: ROGER VINSON
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 19, 2014 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 15 ) is GRANTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 5/19/2014. (sdw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WARREN v. CREWS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL CREWS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DONNIE WARREN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.