SAN ANTONIO v. HENRY et al
| ANIBAL SAN ANTONIO |
| RICHARD SUBSAVAGE, MARK HENRY, JASON CROCKETT and MARK SHIPMAN |
| 3:2013cv00528 |
| October 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| ROGER VINSON |
| CHARLES J KAHN |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (doc. 4 ) is GRANTED to the following extent: Plaintiff's state law claims against the defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted (barred by Floridas statute of limitations). Plaintiff's federal law claims against the defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted (failure to exhaust administrative remedies). The clerk shall close the file. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 1/2/2014. (sdw)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Remand is DENIED. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further pre-trial proceedings, including the issuance of a report and recommendation on defendants Henry, Shipman and Subsavage's motion to dismiss (doc. 4 ). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 11/25/2013. (sdw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
