SPRINGS v. GIELOW et al
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS |
W L GIELOW, KYLE HALL, KASAROVICH, EASTERN and DEMAND |
3:2014cv00105 |
March 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Pensacola Office |
Escambia |
M CASEY RODGERS |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER adopting the Chief Magistrate Judge's 82 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice because Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee at the time he initiated this case and Plaintiff is not ent itled to be granted in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This order hereby directs the Clerk of Court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. This matter is referred to the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Florida, which office should be directed to consider whether to pursue perjury charges against Plaintiff. (Copy of Order placed in US Attorney's inbox per Order referring). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 03/28/2015. (MB) |
Filing 51 ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 34 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 18 Motion Requesting Court to Enter Judgement [sic] and Impose Default Against Defendants and Counselor-Reps of Record, which he characterized as an "Emergency" is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 06/09/2014. (MB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.