ROBINSON v. GIELOW et al
| CHARLES BERNARD ROBINSON, JR |
| WALTER L GIELOW, S S DOVE and RANDY TIFFT |
| 3:2014cv00223 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 58 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motions for transfer (doc's 40 , 49 ) are DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's 36 Motion to Preserve Evidence is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 7/21/2015. (djb)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 38 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's due process claim against Defendant Gielow, and related request for injunctive relief, is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(ii). The clerk is directed to modify the docket to reflect that Lieutenant Walter L. Gielow, Officer Marshall L. Barfield, and Sergeant K. Grant are the only Defendants in this action. This matter is referred to t he assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings on Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Gielow, Barfield, and Grant. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/31/2015. MARSHALL L BARFIELD and K GRANT added. S S DOVE and RANDY TIFFT terminated. (djb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
