BRYANT v. MAIORANA
Plaintiff: JEFFREY BRYANT
Defendant: CHARLES MAIORANA
Case Number: 3:2014cv00489
Filed: September 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Presiding Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petitioner's § 2241 petition (doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/10/2014. (MB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRYANT v. MAIORANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLES MAIORANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY BRYANT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?