SYNOVUS BANK v. SEGER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LLC et al
| SYNOVUS BANK |
| SEGER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LLC, CRESTVIEW HELEN BACK LLC, HELEN BACK AGAIN CRESTVIEW LLC, DUDE N BRAH INC, CHRISTOPHER SEHMAN, YENTI SEHMAN, REWARDS NETWORK ESTABLISHMENT SERVICES INC and FIRST CITY BANK OF FLORIDA |
| 3:2015cv00051 |
| February 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Okaloosa |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 138 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Defendant "Sehman's Motion to Vacate Orders Granting Motion for Assignment" (ECF No. 134 ) is GRANTED, and this Court's orders of January 6 and January 15, 2021 (ECF Nos. 129 and 130 ) are VACATED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/28/2021. (alb)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER ADOPTING 95 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (Please see order.) Plaintiff 4 Dakota Ventures, LLC, will have fourteen days from the date of this order in which to file a Supplemental (Interpleader) Complaint. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/24/2020. (alb)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's 55 Motion for Final Judgment of Garnishment is DENIED as Moot. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/7/2018. (alb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
