GREEN v. BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC
Plaintiff: THOMAS GREEN
Defendant: BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC
Case Number: 3:2015cv00124
Filed: March 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Presiding Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. 42 ) is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/29/2016. (MB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GREEN v. BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS GREEN
Represented By: CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?