WILLIAMS vs MISSISSIPPI VALLEY EDIBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY INC
| DAVID RODGER WILLIAMS |
| RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGIES INC, CHART INDUSTRIES INC, JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION |
| 3:2016cv00266 |
| June 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Okaloosa |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 04/25/2018. (MB)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Chart Industries, Inc., (ECF No. 36 ) and by Defendants Restaurant Technologies, Inc., and McDonald's Corpora tion (ECF No. 34 ) are GRANTED only to the following extent listed herein. Plaintiff is given THIRTY (30) DAYS in which to file a Third Amended Complaint that excludes the Counts and claims identified in Paragraph 1.a., above, and is otherwise fil ed in accordance with the Report and Recommendation, or the the case will be dismissed in its entirety. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 01/04/2018. (Third Amended Complaint due by 2/4/2018). (Mailed to Plaintiff to address on file and emailed). (MB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
