SCOTT v. EGLIN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff: LEAH SCOTT
Defendant: EGLIN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Case Number: 3:2016cv00719
Filed: December 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: ROGER VINSON
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoenas, or Alternatively, Motion for Protective Order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/13/17. (grj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCOTT v. EGLIN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEAH SCOTT
Represented By: ADAM JAMES ELLIS
Represented By: MARIE A MATTOX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EGLIN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Represented By: ARIEL COOK
Represented By: GARY RANDALL WHEELER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?