MYERS v. HODGES
| MYERS |
| HODGES |
| ERIC SCOTT MYERS |
| 3:2017cv00013 |
| January 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Okaloosa |
| CHARLES J KAHN |
| ROGER VINSON |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. (90 Day Deadline set for 6/12/2017 to destroy working file pursuant to retention policy). (MB) |
Filing 7
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 03/13/2017. (MB)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON notified that action is needed Re: #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (no objection filed) (djb) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is ORDERED: (1.) The clerk shall STRIKE the docket entry reflecting the filing of a federal habeas corpus petition (doc. #1 ), and shall RE-DOCKET petitioner's state habeas petition (styled for the Okaloosa County Circuit Court) as an exhibit attached to petitioners #2 Notice of Formal Inquiry. (2.) The court's January 11, 2017 #4 Order requiring the filing of an amended 2254 petition and the payment of the filing fee is VACATED. (3.) Petitioner's first #2 Notice of Formal Inquiry is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner's #5 Second Formal Inquiry is GRANTED to the extent the court has re-docketed petitioner's filings consistent with his intent, and is DENIED in all other respects for lack of jurisdiction. It's RECOMMENDED: That this case be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. That the clerk be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR on 2/9/2017. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 3/9/2017. (djb)
|
| Filing 5 Second Formal Inquiry by ERIC SCOTT MYERS (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (djb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR notified that action is needed Re: #5 Second Formal Inquiry. (djb) |
|
Filing 4
VACATED pursuant to #6 Order ORDER - The clerk shall forward to petitioner the form for use in 2254 cases and a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall file an amended petition and submit payment in the amount of $5.00, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR on 1/11/2017. (Amended Petition due by 2/10/2017. IFP Motion/Filing Fee due by 2/10/2017.) (forms mailed w/order) (djb) Modified on 2/9/2017 (djb).
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (djb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Notice of Formal Inquiry. (filing fee not paid) (djb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Formal Inquiry by ERIC SCOTT MYERS. (djb) (Additional attachment(s) added pursuant to #6 Order on 2/9/2017: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (djb). |
| Filing 1 STRICKEN pursuant to #6 Order PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ERIC SCOTT MYERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (not on court form, no filing fee or IFP motion) (djb) Modified on 2/9/2017 (djb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
