GRANTLEY v. SAM et al
| DERRICK GRANTLEY |
| E L SAM, S I YUN, M NICHOLS and A CRAFT |
| 3:2017cv00035 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| CHARLES J KAHN |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 82 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 69 , is GRANTED in its entirety, and the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF Doc 58 , is DENIED in its entirety. The clerk of the court for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida is directed to enter the following judgment: "Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all claims in this case." The clerk is directed to close the file for this case. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/10/2019. (MB)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants Sam, Enfinger and Nichols' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 37 , is DENIED. Defendants shall file an answer to plaintiff's second amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff's claims against defendant S.I. Yun are DISMISSED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 04/17/2018. (MB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
