WASHINGTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
| LESTER WASHINGTON |
| STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION |
| 3:2018cv00446 |
| March 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Escambia |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| ROGER VINSON |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 74 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's 77 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for plaintiff's failure to keep the court appraised of his current mailing address. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within 60 days, in lieu of which this dismissal shall be WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 10/2/2019. (MB)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 68 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 34 , 36 , 40 ) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED as follows: a. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Escambia County School District/School Board are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; b. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The case is recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for issuance of an order directing Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 9/10/2019. (MB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
