HOGAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner: TIYARI RAHEEM HOGAN
Respondent: MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR
Case Number: 3:2018cv00463
Filed: March 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Walton
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent Adkinson's 12 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Petitioner's 6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/19/2018. (alb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOGAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TIYARI RAHEEM HOGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?