PETERSON v. BOOKER
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY TERRELL PETERSON
Defendant: MICHAEL BOOKER
Case Number: 3:2018cv00574
Filed: April 6, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Okaloosa
Presiding Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Presiding Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff's failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute this action. The clerk shall terminate any pending motions and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 11/21/2018. (sdw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PETERSON v. BOOKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY TERRELL PETERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL BOOKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?