MOORE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
| CAROLYN MOORE |
| OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD |
| 3:2018cv01537 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Escambia |
| GARY R JONES |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, #1 OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, #2 OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD. (djb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Notice to filer Re: #1 Complaint, the attached civil cover sheet contains the wrong PDF image. Please re-file the correct document to insure the accuracy of the docket. (djb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT CAROLYN MOORE against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4231114.), filed by CAROLYN MOORE. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Bristol-Myers, #2 Summons to Otsuka America, #3 Summons to Otsuka Pharmaceutical, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (HANSEN, PAMELA) |
| JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES added. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY and SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON no longer assigned to case. (djb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
