BLOME v. JONES
| RICHARD BLOME |
| JULIE JONES, A JOHNSON, B OWENS, S CALHOUN, HOOVER and H COLWELL |
| 3:2018cv02105 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #8 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. (90 Day Deadline set for 1/22/2019 to dispose working file pursuant to retention policy). (MB) |
Filing 8
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1). Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/22/2018. (MB)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 RESPONSE/MOTION For An Order, #7 Amended Complaint (no service copies). (MB) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 RESPONSE/MOTION For An Order, #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. (MB) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against HOOVER, A JOHNSON, B OWENS, C RICKS SR, C RICKS JR, J RICKS, A REAGER, A JOHNSON, filed by RICHARD BLOME. (djb) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE/MOTION For An Order by RICHARD BLOME. (MB) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #6 RESPONSE/MOTION For An Order. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (MB) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1). That the clerk enter judgment accordingly and close this case. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 09/24/2018. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/22/2018. (MB) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of RICHARD BLOME. Because Plaintiff has no funds accrued in his prison trust fund account, the court will not assess Plaintiff an initial partial filing fee as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A). The clerk of court is directed to MAIL a copy of this order, with the appropriate cover letter to: Department of Corrections. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 9/21/2018. (letter and order mailed to DOC) (djb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, RICHARD BLOME. (MB) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (titled, "Affidavit Of Indigency And Application For Indegent Status Pursuant To Section 57.085, Fla. Stat. (2004)"), #1 Complaint. (No service copies). Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (MB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (titled, "Affidavit Of Indigency And Application For Indegent Status Pursuant To Section 57.085, Fla. Stat. (2004)"), by RICHARD BLOME. (MB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JULIE JONES, filed by RICHARD BLOME. (No service copies). (MB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
