FOLMAR et al v. L'AIR LIQUIDE, SA et al
| ESTATE OF JESSE FOLMAR and KATLYNN S FOLMAR |
| AMERICAN AIR LIQUIDE, INC, NITROUS OXIDE CORP, AIRGAS, AN AIR LIQUIDE COMPANY, AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA SPECIALTY GASES, LLC, AIR LIQUIDE USA, LLC, L'AIR LIQUIDE, SA, AIR LIQUIDE INTERNATIONAL, SA, AIRGAS, INC, AMERICAN AIR LIQUIDE HOLDINGS, INC, ACD, LLC, AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES US, LP, AIR LIQUIDE INDUSTRIAL US, LP, AIRGAS USA, LLC, ACD LLC, AIR LIQUIDE INTERNATIONAL SA, AIR LIQUIDE INDUSTRIAL US LP, AIRGAS INC, L'AIR LIQUIDE SA, AMERICAN AIR LIQUIDE HOLDINGS INC, AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA SPECIALTY GASES LLC, AIR LIQUIDE USA LLC, AIRGAS, AMERICAN AIR LIQUIDE INC, AIRGAS USA LLC and AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES US LP |
| PENSACOLA METAL FABRICATION INC |
| 3:2018cv02125 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #15 MOTION to Intervene by NITROUS OXIDE CORP. (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
Filing 17
ORDER OF STAY. The Court finds it appropriate to stay discovery in this matter pending the Court's ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Accordingly, all discovery in this matter is hereby STAYED until further order of the Court. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/19/2018. (MB)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER - Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, Nitrous Oxide must file an affidavit or sworn declaration establishing the facts necessary for the Court to determine the citizenship of the LLCs' and LPs' members. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/19/2018. (Affidavit or sworn declaration due by 12/3/2018.) (MB)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #14 Consent MOTION for Protective Order , #13 NITROUS OXIDE CORP'S MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #11 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by NITROUS OXIDE CORP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (WIGGINS, CHARLES) (MB) |
| Set Deadlines re #15 MOTION to Intervene by Non-Party, PENSACOLA METAL FABRICATION, INC. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 11/26/2018). (MB) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Intervene by Non-Party, Pensacola Metal Fabrication, Inc.. (COZART, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Protective Order by NITROUS OXIDE CORP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
| Filing 13 NITROUS OXIDE CORP'S MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #11 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by NITROUS OXIDE CORP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #12 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (MB) |
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (BRADFORD, BOBBY) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #11 Plaintiff's MOTION For Remand to State Court, MOTION To Join Party Defendant And Incorporated Memorandum of Law, by KATLYNN S FOLMAR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (MB) |
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's MOTION For Remand to State Court, MOTION To Join Party Defendant And Incorporated Memorandum of Law, by KATLYNN S FOLMAR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (BRADFORD, BOBBY) |
| Filing 10 Amended ANSWER to Complaint by NITROUS OXIDE CORP. (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by NITROUS OXIDE CORP. (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 10/12/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/13/2018. Discovery due by 3/26/2019. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/28/2018. (MB)
|
| Filing 7 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectlyand will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps andwithout punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure foradding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/orchapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available atwww.flnd.uscourts.gov. (MB) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal (please see proposed ISO). (MB) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing of State Court Materials by NITROUS OXIDE CORP re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by NITROUS OXIDE CORP identifying Corporate Parent AIRGAS, INC for NITROUS OXIDE CORP.. (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES NIXON DANIEL on behalf of AIR LIQUIDE USA, LLC, AIRGAS, INC, NITROUS OXIDE CORP (DANIEL, JAMES) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by CHARLES THOMAS WIGGINS on behalf of NITROUS OXIDE CORP (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NITROUS OXIDE CORP from FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, case number 2018 CA 001344. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4298992.), filed by NITROUS OXIDE CORP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (WIGGINS, CHARLES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
