MEACHAM v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
DAVID MEACHAM |
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC |
3:2018cv02287 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
GARY R JONES |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD. (djb) Modified on 12/4/2018 (djb). |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from Gainesville Division Division on 11/29/2018 Case Number 1:18-cv-238. (Filed in wrong division) (djb) |
Filing 2 ORDER - The Clerk is hereby directed to assign all actions filed in, related to, or seeking damages from use of the drug Abilify (Aripirazole) to the undersigned in the Pensacola Division. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 4/11/2017. (djb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4346009.), filed by DAVID MEACHAM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, Bristol Myers, #3 Summons, Otsuka America, #4 Summons, Otsuka Pharmaceutical) (PAREKH, BEHRAM) Modified on 12/6/2018 to correct party name (djb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.