ALFONSO v. SLM CORPORATION
DORIS ALFONSO |
SLM CORPORATION |
3:2018cv02307 |
November 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER OF STAY re #9 Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Arbitration. Within 30 days after the entry of an award in arbitration, unless either party chooses to commence proceedings to confirm, vacate, modify, or correct the award in this Court, Plaintiff shall make the appropriate submission to dismiss this matter with prejudice. At this time, the Clerk is directed to close the file in this case for administrative purposes. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/16/2019. (sdw) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION TO STAY THE CASE PENDING ARBITRATION by SLM CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (SAINVIL, AKIESHA) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #9 STIPULATION TO STAY THE CASE PENDING ARBITRATION. (sdw) |
Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/8/2019. Discovery due by 6/19/2019. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/26/2018. (MB) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. (21 days to January 16, 2019). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/26/2018. (Answer due by 1/16/2019.) (MB) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DORIS ALFONSO. SLM CORPORATION served on 12/5/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (DERRY, JASON) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by SLM CORPORATION identifying Corporate Parent SLM CORPORATION for SLM CORPORATION.. (SAINVIL, AKIESHA) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by SLM CORPORATION. (SAINVIL, AKIESHA) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (sdw) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SLM CORPORATION. (sdw) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (DERRY, JASON) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SLM CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4346534.), filed by DORIS ALFONSO. (Attachments: #1 Summons for SLM Corporation to be Issued) (DERRY, JASON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ALFONSO v. SLM CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SLM CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | AKIESHA RENEE GILCRIST SAINVIL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DORIS ALFONSO | |
Represented By: | JASON ROBERT DERRY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.