KELLEY v. IPACESETTERS LLC
| Penny Kelley |
| iPacesetters LLC |
| 3:2018cv02392 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Sean M. Gibbons of the firm Roth Jackson is admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(C). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/12/2019. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4402480.) (alb) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4402480.) by IPACESETTERS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (GIBBONS, SEAN) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Genevieve C. Bradley of the firm Roth Jackson is admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(C). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/8/2019. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Genevieve C. Bradley.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4399382.) (alb) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Genevieve C. Bradley.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4399382.) by IPACESETTERS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (BRADLEY, GENEVIEVE) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (HARRELL, DANIEL) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (djb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 Initial Scheduling Order, (Rule 26 Meeting Report not filed) (djb) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by IPACESETTERS LLC. (HARRELL, DANIEL) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES GARRITY on behalf of PENNY KELLEY (GARRITY, JAMES) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer, filed by iPacesetters LLC, iPacesetters LLC answer due 1/10/2019. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/21/2018. (alb)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 1/4/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/4/2019. Discovery due by 6/19/2019. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/21/2018. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal, #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (see proposed ISO, verified attys admitted.) (alb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by iPacesetters LLC. (SPENCER, ANDREW) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by iPacesetters LLC. (SPENCER, ANDREW) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (SPENCER, ANDREW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by iPacesetters LLC from Circuit Civil Escambia County, case number 2018 CA 001389. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4362484.), filed by iPacesetters LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (SPENCER, ANDREW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
