MONTGOMERY v. CLIENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
| Rebecca Montgomery |
| Client Management Services and John Doe |
| 3:2019cv00397 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| CHARLES J KAHN |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON for all further proceedings. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 3/1/2019. (erl)**Please use the new judge's initials for all future filings: 3:19cv397-MCR/HTC.
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CLIENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES. (sdw) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (sdw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Client Management Services ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4404107.), filed by Rebecca Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (OWENS, SCOTT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
