GOLDSMITH v. BAPTIST HEALTHCARE
| ALEXANDRA GOLDSMITH |
| BAPTIST HEALTHCARE |
| 3:2019cv00417 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (VAN SICKLE, RUSSELL) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #13 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (sdw) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by BAPTIST HEALTHCARE. (VAN SICKLE, RUSSELL) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by BAPTIST HEALTHCARE. (VAN SICKLE, RUSSELL) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against BAPTIST HEALTHCARE, filed by ALEXANDRA GOLDSMITH. (WESTBERRY, RICHARD) |
Filing 9
ORDER ON RULE 26(f) OBLIGATIONS. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/14/2019. (sdw)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 3/28/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/29/2019. Discovery due by 9/10/2019. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/14/2019. (sdw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Complaint filed by BAPTIST HEALTHCARE. (Answer due by 3/29/2019.) Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/14/2019. (sdw)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by BAPTIST HEALTHCARE. (VAN SICKLE, RUSSELL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by RUSSELL FRANK VAN SICKLE on behalf of BAPTIST HEALTHCARE (VAN SICKLE, RUSSELL) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint . (please see proposed ISO) (sdw) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ALEXANDRA GOLDSMITH. BAPTIST HEALTHCARE served on 2/22/2019, answer due 3/15/2019. (WESTBERRY, RICHARD) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BAPTIST HEALTHCARE. (sdw) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR SUMMONS by ALEXANDRA GOLDSMITH (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BAPTIST HEALTHCARE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4409701.), filed by ALEXANDRA GOLDSMITH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GOLDSMITH v. BAPTIST HEALTHCARE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BAPTIST HEALTHCARE | |
| Represented By: | RUSSELL FRANK VAN SICKLE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ALEXANDRA GOLDSMITH | |
| Represented By: | CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS |
| Represented By: | RICHARD JOHN WESTBERRY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
