PHAN v 3M COMPANY et al
| KENNY PHAN |
| AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY |
| 3:2019cv00729 |
| April 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 NOTICE REGARDING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY OF RECORD. (djb) |
| Filing 30 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 8:19-cv-00272. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 29 Conditional Transfer Order - 1 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2885, transferring case to USDC, Northern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. Case transferred electronically. (es) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
Filing 28
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING RULINGS BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION #26 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (es) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.]
|
| Filing 27 SUPPLEMENT to Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Rulings By The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation #26 re [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Branscome, Kimberly) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 26 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Rulings By The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed by Defendant 3M Company. Motion set for hearing on 4/15/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Branscome, Kimberly) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 25 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant 3M Company identifying 3M Company as Corporate Parent. (Branscome, Kimberly) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 24 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kimberly O Branscome counsel for Defendant 3M Company. Adding Kimberly Branscome as counsel of record for 3M Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attorney Kimberly O Branscome added to party 3M Company(pty:dft))(Branscome, Kimberly) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 23 [IN CHAMBERS] TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Order to Show Cause re Jurisdiction issued 2/19/19 is ordered DISCHARGED. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this action. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kenny Phan, upon Defendant 3M Company served on 2/28/2019, answer due 3/21/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mai Yang, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kenny Phan, upon Defendant AEARO Technologies LLC served on 2/28/2019, answer due 3/21/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mai Yang, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 20 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant 3M Company, AEARO Technologies LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiff Kenny Phan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Clinton Casperson on behalf of Plaintiff Kenny Phan. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Rebecca King on behalf of Plaintiff Kenny Phan. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Shawn P. Fox on behalf of Plaintiff Kenny Phan. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Sean Patrick Tracey on behalf of Plaintiff Kenny Phan. RE: Notice of Filing Fee. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: SACV19-00267 AG(KESx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick and Judge James V. Selna to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge SACV19-00272 AG(KESx). Signed by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (lwag) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.]
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE JURISDICTION by Judge James V. Selna. The Court has made a preliminary review of the jurisdictional allegations in the: Complaint filed February 12, 2019 by plaintiff Kenny Phan ("Phan"). Phan is ordered to file an amended initial pleading within 15 days identifying each member of each alleged LLC and the members citizenship and principal place of business as the date of the filing of the initial pleading. If any member is itself an LLC, the same information shall be provided for each subtier member, and if need be, for each successive subtier. (See document for further details) (es) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.]
|
| Filing 13 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Clinton Casperson. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Rebecca King. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Shawn P. Fox. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Sean Patrick Tracey. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants 3M Company, and AEARO Technologies LLC. (jtil) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Plaintiff Kenny Phan. (Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kenny Phan, identifying 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC, Robinson Calcagnie, Inc., Tracey & Fox. (Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Kenny Phan. (Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kenny Phan. (Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23200960 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Kenny Phan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Attorney Mark P Robinson, Jr added to party Kenny Phan(pty:pla))(Robinson, Mark) [Transferred from California Central on 4/18/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
