WEILER v. CITY OF FREEPORT et al
| DANA WEILER |
| ELIZABETH BRANNON, CITY OF FREEPORT and EDDIE HARRIS |
| 3:2019cv01360 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| ROGER VINSON |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by ELIZABETH BRANNON, CITY OF FREEPORT, EDDIE HARRIS. (SEAGLE, SCOTT) |
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Discovery due by 9/30/2019. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 5/6/2019. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal. (See proposed ISO) (alb) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (SEAGLE, SCOTT) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by EDDIE HARRIS, ELIZABETH BRANNON, CITY OF FREEPORT from IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA, case number 2016-CA-000206. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4480792.), filed by EDDIE HARRIS, ELIZABETH BRANNON, CITY OF FREEPORT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-CIVIL COVER SHEET, #2 Exhibit B-COMPLAINT, #3 Exhibit C-SUMMONS ISSUED, #4 Exhibit D-NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, #5 Exhibit E-ACCEPTANCE & WAIVER OF SERVICE, #6 Exhibit F-NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE)) (SEAGLE, SCOTT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
