SHOWALTER v. WALMART INC
GINGER L SHOWALTER |
WALMART INC |
3:2019cv01487 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
M CASEY RODGERS |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines re #12 MOTION for Leave to File SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 7/24/2019.) (sdw) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by GINGER L SHOWALTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT) (WESTBERRY, RICHARD) |
Filing 11 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/14/2019. Discovery due by 1/2/2020. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/1/2019. (sdw) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for More Definiate Statement by WALMART INC. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 7/11/2019). (LONGORIA, DIANE) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by WALMART INC identifying Corporate Parent WALMART STORES EAST LP for WALMART INC.. (LONGORIA, DIANE) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GINGER L SHOWALTER. WALMART INC served on 5/16/2019, answer due 6/6/2019. (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against WALMART INC, filed by GINGER L SHOWALTER. (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Set Deadlines re #7 First Amended Complaint. Answer due by 6/27/2019. (sdw) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , up through and including a date fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/10/2019. (sdw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . (please see proposed ISO) (sdw) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by WALMART INC. (TALBERT, JAMES) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WALMART INC. (sdw) |
Filing 3 ORDER. SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON recused. Case reassigned to JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS for all further proceedings. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 5/15/2019. (sdw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR SUMMONS by GINGER L SHOWALTER (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walmart Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4492358.), filed by GINGER L SHOWALTER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SHOWALTER v. WALMART INC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GINGER L SHOWALTER | |
Represented By: | CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS |
Represented By: | RICHARD JOHN WESTBERRY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WALMART INC | |
Represented By: | DIANE M LONGORIA |
Represented By: | JAMES ANDREW TALBERT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.