VAUGHN et al v 3M COMPANY
| DRUSILLA VAUGHN and JASON VAUGHN |
| 3M COMPANY |
| 3:2019cv01506 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Christina Olund on 05/20/2019, filed by DRUSILLA VAUGHN, JASON VAUGHN. (HOLLAND, ERIC) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 3M COMPANY. (djb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. The party names are to be added using all caps and no punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or Chapter IV of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide" (both available on the courts website) (djb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4494391.), filed by Drusilla Vaughn, Jason Vaughn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Summons) (HOLLAND, ERIC) |
| MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES added. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY no longer assigned to case. (djb) |
| Cases associated: Create association to 3:19-md-02885-MCR-GRJ. (djb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
