SMITH et al v 3M COMPANY
| MICHAEL JACOBS, STEVEN FANUKE, TEDDY LAWRENCE, MICHAEL BLUMER, JORDAN STONER, JASON KERN, LARRY STARRATT, JOSEPH MARTINES, ROBERT SMITH, BRENT ARCHER and JOSEPH LESUEUR |
| 3M COMPANY |
| 3:2019cv01519 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE Regarding Attorney Admission and #1 Notice Regarding Electronic Filing Requirement as to counsel of record, Bryant Michael Greening. (djb) |
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:19-cv-03033. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 6 TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Florida, the electronic record. (jh, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to The Northern District of Florida. Mailed notice(jh, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to MDL 2885; Conditional Transfer Order filed 5/21/2019. (jh, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ew, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant 3M Company (mc, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Brnet Archer, MICHAEL BLUMER, STEVEN FANUKE, MICHAEL JACOBS, JASON KERN, JOSEPH LESUEUR, Teddy Lawrence, JOSEPH MARTINES, LARRY STARRATT, JORDAN STONER, Robert Smith by Bryant Michael Greening (Greening, Bryant) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Brnet Archer, MICHAEL BLUMER, STEVEN FANUKE, MICHAEL JACOBS, JASON KERN, JOSEPH LESUEUR, Teddy Lawrence, JOSEPH MARTINES, LARRY STARRATT, JORDAN STONER, Robert Smith by Kyle Adam Van Slyke (Van Slyke, Kyle) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by JORDAN STONER, JASON KERN, Teddy Lawrence, MICHAEL JACOBS, STEVEN FANUKE, Brnet Archer, LARRY STARRATT, Robert Smith, JOSEPH LESUEUR, MICHAEL BLUMER, JOSEPH MARTINES; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15802878. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Van Slyke, Kyle) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 5/21/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.