MOOREHEAD v. ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC
Andrew Moorehead |
ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC |
3:2019cv01622 |
June 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, attempted, not known, unable to forward. Mail sent to Andrew Moorehead Re: #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (alb) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted - R&R flag set Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/16/2019. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/13/2019. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 Order. (No response filed.) (alb) |
Filing 5 ORDER re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this order in which to file a response. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 6/26/2019). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 6/12/2019. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC identifying Corporate Parent Aramark Educational Services, LLC, Other Affiliate ARAMARK, Other Affiliate Aramark Educational Group, LLC, Other Affiliate ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., Other Affiliate Aramark Intermediate HoldCo Corp. for ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC.. (ROOS, CARLOTTA) |
Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC. (ROOS, CARLOTTA) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal. (alb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC from Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit for Escambia County, case number 2019 CA 000679. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number BFLNDC-4508753.), filed by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (ROOS, CARLOTTA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MOOREHEAD v. ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC | |
Represented By: | CARLOTTA JUSTINE ROOS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew Moorehead | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.