MOOREHEAD v. ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC
Plaintiff: Andrew Moorehead
Defendant: ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv01622
Filed: June 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2019 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, attempted, not known, unable to forward. Mail sent to Andrew Moorehead Re: #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (alb)
July 16, 2019 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted - R&R flag set Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/16/2019. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/13/2019. (alb)
July 3, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 Order. (No response filed.) (alb)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this order in which to file a response. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 6/26/2019). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 6/12/2019. (alb)
June 11, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb)
June 10, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC identifying Corporate Parent Aramark Educational Services, LLC, Other Affiliate ARAMARK, Other Affiliate Aramark Educational Group, LLC, Other Affiliate ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., Other Affiliate Aramark Intermediate HoldCo Corp. for ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC.. (ROOS, CARLOTTA)
June 10, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC. (ROOS, CARLOTTA)
June 4, 2019 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb)
June 4, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal. (alb)
June 3, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC from Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit for Escambia County, case number 2019 CA 000679. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number BFLNDC-4508753.), filed by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (ROOS, CARLOTTA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MOOREHEAD v. ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC
Represented By: CARLOTTA JUSTINE ROOS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Moorehead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?