HAYNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| STEVEN HAYNES |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 3:2019cv01712 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 6 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in Western District of Louisiana as case 2:19-cv-00999, filed 7/31/2019. (alb) |
| Filing 6 Interdistrict Transfer to the Western District of Louisiana Lake Charles located at 611 Broad Street Suite 188 Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601. (alb) |
Filing 5
ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Clerk is directed to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 7/31/2019. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (No objections filed.) (alb) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by STEVEN HAYNES. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the case file, including any service copies and pending motions, be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, for all further proceedings. R&R flag set (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/24/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 06/26/2019. (rcb) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by STEVEN HAYNES **1 Service Copy Received** (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus & 3 Docket Annotation-1 Service Copy Received on 6-21-2019. (rcb) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by STEVEN HAYNES. (rcb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STEVEN HAYNES.*No Service Copies provided** (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus & #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (rcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HAYNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: STEVEN HAYNES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
